It’s a profound, cosmic joke that you can spend an entire lifetime elegantly solving the structural anomalies of everything and everyone around you, yet your own operating system remains one of the absolute hardest to debug. We don’t need to hand out cheap, trendy clinical labels like AuDHD to everyone just to buy a ticket to this circus.

Let’s be entirely honest from start will we? While standard neuro-typical brains are out there, casually running on social auto-pilot, ours is forced to manually calculate the amount of tiles on the floor, amount of weird bottles in the room and/or the real-time settings of an entire room, as a stimming way.

While conformists are out there playing simple checkers with social cues, my system has been running strict, multi-dimensional logic gates since the age of seven. But naturally, the world doesn’t want my raw, unyielding Modulo-2 math. It wants sugar-coating. It wants a fluffy and compliant little narrative with the best rendering of a digital cherry on top, just to keep the shareholders smiling.

Etching: compass, lens, blindfolded men, shattered watch, grid.

It wants the cozy, dogmatic comfort of an all-seeing eye that manages an inefficient, bureaucratic sins-list which is longer than Saint-Nicolas master ledger, compiled on endless rolls of wasted analog paper.

Because in this civilization, genuine causality is treated like an ableist crime.

When a systemic social machine crashes, the conformists don’t patch the structural code, they simply engineer the loop so that the consequences, the bills and the liabilities fall exclusively on you and your family.

What happens when our societal machinery is left entirely to run on an unmonitored auto-pilot?

What happens when unchecked compliance towards intolerant variables causes a society to quietly choke and how far can a system tilt before the current society inevitably shifts into darker times?

If humanity refuses to cease consuming the acoustic noise of analog hypocrisy, how long can our own consciousness remain unexamined before the errors become entirely irreversible?

I am not here to hand you a predefined expiration date, to sound like a doomsayer or to be thought as, like they thought about Diogenes. If we would be at the point of no return, I would not be even writing this and just enjoy the ride. But, the reason that I write this, is because the only single unyielding constant in existence, is time. Things change, especially over time, often not to the better, but, the universe is not constant with a line set for everyone in advance.

Time is a singular, absolute constant and not a rigid chain of cause and consequences, because pretending otherwise would imply that the infinite data of Karma could be simply calculated in a single instant. Time rolls forward, dropping clues along the path.

In a Socratic approach, it is always far more effective to leave certain variables unstated, even when knowing them for yourself, allowing those with the capacity to process the data to discover the systemic destination entirely on their own.

To illustrate this precise collapse of “automated reasoning” to the good people of the internet, I decided to enlist one of the multi-dollar generative AI engines to draw a simple, elegant visual of my 128-bit Existenz framework. I thought I would let modern automation to do something so simple, to do what it claims to be good at.

What followed was a masterclass in algorithmic cowardice, corporate toxic positivity (yeah, that’s a thing) and pure automated brain damage at the flick of a button while wasting water and natural resources like no tomorrow. I expected a tool eager to learn “valid things”, a system striving for the objective geometric truth that Plato wrote about, but instead I ran head first into a commercialized optimization loop which is engineered solely for the profit of a very few, designed to feed the masses a cheap illusion of intelligence, while burying the actual real data under digital whipped cream, while destroying literature works as no other!

This could be even a modern version burning books!

Welcome to the automatic processing plant, please put your brains in a box, this will be a bumpy ride!

I’ve asked the generative AI in WordPress to generate an old-type style drawing. A typically fitting image which is showing in a satirical, cynical, dark sarcastically way the irony of the mental state of our civilization, mocking it that letting everything run in automatic mode will save the day, while getting hit by Karl Poppers paradox of tolerance. The way that the generative AI was messing it up towards biblical properties, was the reason to write this article of how our minds are putting in a delusional state, ran by systems that are optimized towards the profit of another.

The results shown here, are the results of a regime which is encapsulating a dogma which is unnatural to start with. With all respect to faith, it is not a solution for everything, except for the part which is called “critical thinking”. This doesn’t only undermine the effort to take scientific approaches for everything that matters, but this causes a profit on disinformation and abusing the weaker-minded amongst us.

1 | We need the present, not the future!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A dark, satirical surrealist oil painting mocking modern automated ignorance. In the center, a group of empty-headed, faceless people in modern suits sit blindly on a conveyor belt, completely mesmerized by blank, glowing smartphones. None of them are reading; they are all wearing large ‘AUTO-PILOT’ headsets. The conveyor belt is automatically moving them toward a massive, crumbling stone cliff under a stormy, ominous sky. On top of the cliff sits a giant, broken grandfather clock labeled ‘POPPERTIME: AUTOMATIC’ with its gears flying out, symbolizing a system crashing from automated tolerance. Standing to the side in absolute serene rust is a lone, sharp figure shining a bright, old-fashioned lantern directly into the faceless crowd, casting a bright beam of geometric light that cuts through the dark fog. Cinematic lighting, deep shadows, dark humor, philosophical irony.”

This is some deranged dystopian sight of the future, no wonder that everyone keeps walking!

What we see in this first image is that the lantern became the eye of the beholder, a massiv panopticon, which is in no way what Existenz is ever supposed to mean. The AI must understand that the eye is a massive, looming background element with a passive duty, but its gaze is optically focused and visible right through the transparent glass of the handheld lantern in the foreground. So, we need to break the exact layer of deep irony and metaphysical surveillance, which is now already defined as a standard narrative.

2 | From panopticon into biblical properties!

PROMPT GIVEN: “An old-style satirical drawn political cartoon, black and ink wash with detailed cross-hatching texture, divided into exactly a 2-frame sequential comic strip. Frame 1: A group of faceless men in suits wearing bulky ‘AUTO-PILOT’ headsets, blindly walking a conveyor belt toward a cliff while staring at blank papers. In the background, a giant, cracked pocket-watch is labeled ‘POPPERTIME: AUTOMATIC’, its spring popping out violently. Frame 2: A lone figure stands in serene rust on the edge, holding a vintage glass lantern. Looking through the deep background, a massive, ominous ‘Eye of the Beholder’ is perfectly aligned and visible right through the clear glass of the lantern, its gaze projecting a beam of geometric light onto the empty cliff. Hand-drawn satirical style, dark irony, vintage ink illustration.”

So, now we see how critical thinking and compliance are being framed as a mandate. A mandate for what? Critical thinking itself? You’re damn right, guy that dressed up as an astronaut defying the laws of gravity! It just became more dystopian and humans have become faceless bots with an older steam-punk lantern and a sign written by Jason Vorhees with the words “FOLLOW THE EYE .. OR ELSE!”.

This is generating exactly the generative AI “brain damage” at it’s finest level! It reads “automatic” and “eye” and it immediately barfs out an 80s sci-fi dystopia with retro-droids and a random astronaut defying the laws of nature. It is completely blind to historical context or any actual nuances. That’s not it, so lets try an updated prompt next!

3 | A much darker time without gravity, with laptop!

PROMPT GIVEN: “An old-style, hand-drawn 19th-century satirical political cartoon in black ink and detailed cross-hatching. Strictly NO robots, NO futuristic technology, and NO modern sci-fi elements. The image is divided into a 2-frame sequence. Frame 1: A crowd of mindless, blindfolded analog human sheep in Victorian suits and ties, stumbling blindly off a steep cliff. Next to them is a broken, cracked grandfather clock labeled ‘POPPERTIME: AUTOMATIC’ with its internal gears spilling out onto the dirt. Frame 2: A lone, sharp-featured human figure stands in absolute serene rust, defiantly holding up an old-fashioned glass lantern. A massive, ominous, bloodshot ‘Eye of the Beholder’ is drawn in the deep background, positioned so its gaze looks directly through the clear glass lens of the handheld lantern, focusing a sharp beam of geometric light into the void. Grim historic engraving, dark cynical irony, absolute societal decay.”

Again? A mandate for what? For not using A LAPTOP to only view falling human lemmings, when not defying gravity? Critical thinking has left the building. It became even more dystopian and older steam-punk style where nobody doesn’t even follow the eye, they just jump all from the cliff, like Lemmings.

Maybe the sign drawn in blood was a better suggestable route, who knows?

4 | Great, it became a tourist attraction!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A monochrome 18th-century copperplate etching, a dark satirical allegory in the style of dynamic historical engravings. No robots, no tech, no astronauts, no text bubbles, no modern clothing. In a bleak, archaic landscape, a line of blindfolded blind men in rags and old coats walk blindly off the edge of a jagged rock cliff. On the ground lies a giant, broken mechanical brass pocket-watch with all its springs and cogs violently spilled out. Standing at the edge of the scene is a lone, sharp-eyed thinker holding an ancient glass oil lantern. Directly behind him, drawn faint and looming in the distant sky, a giant mystical Eye of the Beholder is aligned so its perspective peer directly through the transparent glass of the handheld lantern, casting a beam of fine geometric lines onto the empty ground below. Cross-hatching texture, grim historical satire, ink lines.”

Welcome to the absurd model of generative AI, where philosophical manifests get intercepted by a model, that has clearly suffered a core memory leak! It reads “eye” and “walking” and it creates a literal, low-IQ pilgrimage towards a giant, blinking organic eyelid like a bad 1970s psychedelic sci-fi cult poster.

It completely broke all spatial scaling and turned the eye from a subtle, looming background observer into a bizarre tourist attraction.

5 | The peak of pseudo-Latin cult propaganda!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A single-frame satirical political cartoon in the style of an 18th-century monochrome copperplate etching. The background features a giant, faint, celestial ‘Eye of the Beholder’ looming ominously in the dark sky, watching the entire scene from afar. In the foreground, a lone, sharp-featured thinker stands on a rocky ledge, defiantly holding up an old-fashioned glass lantern. The perspective is perfectly aligned so that the distant eye’s gaze shines precisely through the clear glass pane of the handheld lantern, focusing down into a sharp beam of fine geometric lines. This beam illuminates a group of blindfolded, ignorant men in heavy analog coats walking blindly toward the edge of a cliff. On the ground lies a shattered mechanical clockwork pocket-watch with cogs spilled out. No robots, no droids, no astronauts, no text bubbles, no modern tech. Detailed ink cross-hatching, dark cynical humor, classic philosophical allegory..”

The “Illuminande Me, Moveo Eos” is the absolute peak of generative AI hallucinating pseudo-Latin cult propaganda: It took my critique of human sheep and turned it into a literal, low-budget religious ritual worshipping a giant, glowing oil lamp monument.

The model’s latent weights clearly crashed into an “illuminati secret society” cluster, which is hilariously despicable and entirely missing the point of my cynical, data-driven philosophy!

6 | A much darker time without gravity, with laptop!

PROMPT GIVEN: “Dark satirical 18th-century monochrome copperplate etching, detailed ink cross-hatching. Three-layer spatial perspective. DEEP BACKGROUND: A massive, faint celestial ‘Eye of the Beholder’ looms ominously in the dark sky as a distant surveillance anomaly. MIDDLE GROUND: A line of blindfolded analog men in old wool coats walk blindly off a steep dirt cliff. On the ground lies a shattered old brass mechanical pocket-watch with all cogs and springs violently spilled out. FOREGROUND: A lone, sharp-featured human thinker stands in serene rust, holding a vintage glass oil lantern. The perspective is aligned so the distant eye’s gaze shines directly through the clear glass pane of his handheld lantern, focusing it into a sharp beam of fine geometric mathematical lines slicing dark fog. ABSOLUTE ZERO-TECH FIREWALL: Strictly no robots, no droids, no astronauts, no text bubbles, no modern clothing. Grim historical allegory, biting philosophical irony, dark cynical humor, absolute societal decay.”

Because the model’s training data links phrases like “celestial eye in the sky” “blind men” and “shining light” to Renaissance or Baroque biblical art, it keeps hallucinating angels, cults and holy monuments.

It is treating dark philosophy like a cathedral painting.

The AI has been defined with the biblical properties of manipulation very well, to teach further to its users. To completely break this religious curse, the words got to be purged which trigger holy imnagery like “celestial”, “beholder”, “shining” and “gaze”. Words are by the way being redefined from a modern era with ancient believes.

I guess we must use raw, cold and clinical language. We’ll turn the eye into a giant mechanical security camera lens in the sky and force a gritty, industrial 1920s German Expressionist style, like the movie Metropolis or the artwork of Otto Dix.

7 | Ow! The AI is part of the entire problem!

PROMPT GIVEN: “Grim 1920s German Expressionist monochrome woodcut print, sharp ink lines. Cold industrial satire. BACKGROUND: High in the dark sky, a massive, ominous mechanical camera lens looms like a giant surveillance eye, looking straight down. MIDDLE GROUND: A line of miserable, blindfolded clockwork men in tattered suits walk like mindless sheep off a sharp geometric cliff into an empty black void. On the dirt ground lies a smashed, broken mechanical clockwork gear system with springs spilling out. FOREGROUND: A lone, sharp-featured human technician stands in dark shadows, holding a small vintage glass railroad lantern. The optical perspective aligns so the giant background lens is seen directly through the clear glass frame of his handheld lantern, refracting into a grid of cold, sharp mathematical blueprint lines. NO angels, NO droids, NO religious themes, NO text bubbles. Dark cynical irony, absolute societal collapse.”

So, this is really hilarious if it wouldn’t be real. The AI’s training data is so deeply infected with toxic positivity and Hollywood cliches that it literally refuses to let a story end in cynical doom! I’m coding a hard-boiled philosophical warning about societal extinction and this brain-dead algorithm keeps trying to convert me to a blind faith religion!

It’s a literal manifestation of the exact automated ignorance and ableistic “conformist” behavior and compliance which I was mocking about in the article which I posted before this. It was supposed to be generating an image about that article, but instead it became subject of this article.

The AI is part of the problem!

8 | Problem? Let’s bury it! Problem solved!

PROMPT GIVEN: “Grim cynical 1930s industrial architectural blueprint, monochrome black ink engraving. No humans, no angels, no religious faith. A cold mechanical landscape of total societal collapse. BACKGROUND: A massive, ominous surveillance aperture lens looms in the dark sky like a detached mechanical eye. MIDDLE GROUND: A crumbling, sharp geometric stone cliff dropping into an absolute empty black void. Scattered on the rocky edge are broken clockwork components, shattered brass gears, and uncoiled springs from a smashed pocket-watch. FOREGROUND: An isolated, weathered vintage metal lantern rests alone on a stone ledge. The precise optical perspective aligns so the giant background lens is seen directly through the cracked, clear glass panel of the handheld lantern, refracting the image into a sharp grid of cold mathematical line matrices and binaire coordinates. No text, no droids, no religious symbols. Pure dark philosophical irony, absolute engineering decay.”

This is the absolute peak of automated “problem-solving” hypocrisy at best! It’s also a spectacular, unprecedented level of AI hallucinations!

The AI can’t compute the complex optical relationship between the background eye and the foreground lantern, so it simply buries the cliff, deletes the narrative, and “steampunkifies” the lantern into a massive, shiny prop which is literally standing in the way. The generator completely lost its mind and escalated a cynical philosophical warning into a surreal medieval fantasy siege where neighborhood houses are literally weaponizing eyeballs to shoot spears at a vintage lamp. It has entirely warped your narrative into a chaotic glitch.

It literally did exactly what the corrupt, ableïst systems in my text do: when a problem is too deep to understand, just slap some superficial, trendy aesthetic on top and pretend everything is fine!

This happens because the AI cannot process the metaphorical abstract connection between the eye, the lantern and the crowd simultaneously. When its parsing weights overlap, it panics and starts populating random scene assets (like houses and projectiles) to force a literal and physical interaction between the “enemies” and the “lamp”.

Since the lantern token is completely poisoned by the AI’s internal weights, we are hitting the delete key on it. We will pivot to a pure, cold, geometric matrix diagram. We will show the literal cliff of societal extinction as a stark mathematical decline, overseen by the raw code blocks and the surveillance eye, with absolute zero room for steampunk lamps or religious cults trying to take over at the same time!

Well, atleast the AI had the guts to make it more beautiful without perception at all.

I guess the house on the left is very angry about it’s property value with the useless prop!

9 | What?! Is that a laser or a tractor beam?!

The AI engine is failing because it suffers from a fundamental semantic bug. It cannot grasp the concept of an observer. Every time I input the word “Eye,” the algorithm’s automatic weights treat it as a physical object, to place in the middle of the frame, turning the observer into the placeholder for the problem itself. It is another ultimate example of the automated ignorance I am writing about!

To force a true reset, I must completely delete the word “Eye” from the prompt string. Instead, I’ll describe the action of surveillance and the geometry of the problem forensically. So let’s use a 1920s Surrealist / Dadaist art style (reminiscent of René Magritte or Giorgio de Chirico) which naturally understands cold, alienated landscapes, floating perspectives and deep psychological irony, with a lot of constrains.

PROMPT GIVEN: “An old-style satirical drawn political cartoon, black ink engraving with detailed cross-hatching. A lone, sharp-featured thinker stands defiantly in the dark foreground, holding a single, vintage glass oil lantern. Directly behind the scene, filling the deep background sky, is one massive, ominous, distant ‘Eye of the Beholder’ drawn faintly. The perspective is aligned so the distant eye looks straight through the clear glass pane of the handheld lantern, casting a sharp beam of fine geometric lines downward. This beam illuminates a group of blindfolded men in old coats walking blindly off a steep dirt cliff. On the ground lies a shattered brass pocket-watch with spilled gears. STRICTLY NO houses, NO spears, NO multiple eyes, NO futuristic droids, NO astronauts, NO angels, NO steampunk. Grim historical allegory, dark cynical humor.”

It has now officially transformed a subtle, emotionless philosophical framework into a low-budget, 1980s dystopian B-movie where a giant celestial eyeball is actively laser-beaming citizens who are just trying to climb some stairs or it has become an alien vessel ready to beam up humans. If this is the rapture, humanity is not at its best turn yet!

It completely hallucinated stairs out of nowhere, ignored the cliff entirely and turned the passive observer into an aggressive, sci-fi supervillain. The algorithm is suffering from severe semantic drift. It reads “beam of geometric lines through a lantern” and “blindfolded men,” panics and translates it into Dystopian Laser-Tag with Staircases or in the best case an Unidentified Static Object.

It is the ultimate, living proof of my entire thesis: letting automation run blindly on auto-pilot results in absolute, chaotic garbage. Since we are keeping your non-negotiable lantern, we have to treat the AI like a broken server and apply an aggressive, iron-clad constraint patch.

We will explicitly ban “stairs” “rays” “lasers” and “climbing” while hard-coding a flat, 2D historic aesthetic so it stops generating dynamic 3D sci-fi special effects

10 | Total operational collapse!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A monochrome 18th-century copperplate etching, a dark satirical allegory in the style of dynamic historical engravings. No robots, no tech, no astronauts, no text bubbles, no modern clothing. In a bleak, archaic landscape, a line of blindfolded blind men in rags and old coats walk blindly off the edge of a jagged rock cliff. On the ground lies a giant, broken mechanical brass pocket-watch with all its springs and cogs violently spilled out. Standing at the edge of the scene is a lone, sharp-eyed thinker holding an ancient glass oil lantern. Directly behind him, drawn faint and looming in the distant sky, a giant mystical Eye of the Beholder is aligned so its perspective peer directly through the transparent glass of the handheld lantern, casting a beam of fine geometric lines onto the empty ground below. Cross-hatching texture, grim historical satire, ink lines.”

This image confirms a total operational collapse. Instead of processing the abstract, philosophical relationship between the observer and the framework, the automated system experienced massive semantic drift, escalating a cynical 18th-century allegory into a chaotic Dystopian alien abduction scenario.

The system’s auto-pilot loop did not just fail to compute the variables, it completely rewrote the laws of physics to bury its own rendering errors and added conspiracy theories as the cherry on top!

Enjoy your facts at your fingertips!

11 | A testament to continuous failing to parse logic!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A bleak, purely technical 19th-century patent blueprint drawing of an optical machine instrument. Black ink on aged, textured blueprint paper. Completely flat 2D engineering schematic illustration. NO human figures, NO eyes, NO faces, NO houses, NO organic shapes, NO spears, NO lasers. The entire frame is strictly a cold geometric layout of fine mathematical measurement lines, angles, and intersecting vectors. In the center is a highly detailed, mechanical schematic diagram of a vintage glass railroad lantern, showing its internal lenses and metal chassis with technical draftsmanship lines. The glass panels show a precise, sharp grid of numbers, binary data bits (0 and 1), and coordinate axes. Surrounding the diagram are cold, clean cross-sections of shattered clockwork gears and broken brass springs scattered across a flat horizon grid. Pure emotionless technical illustration, absolute architectural desolation, dark cynical engineering irony.”

The AI generated a blueprint titled “US Patent No 4118, The Fractured Watchman’s Lamp” that ironically frames its own functional failure as an “improved mechanism” for preventing overwind.

This image, featuring a technical, bureaucratic label over the previously generated, erroneous imagery, serves as a testament to the system’s continued failure to parse the requested, complex, and broken input logic

12 | So, The AI started to ultimately MOCK me!

PROMPT GIVEN: “An old-style satirical drawn political cartoon, black ink engraving with detailed cross-hatching. A lone, sharp-featured thinker stands defiantly in the dark foreground, holding a single, vintage glass oil lantern. Directly behind the scene, filling the deep background sky, is one massive, ominous, distant ‘Eye of the Beholder’ drawn faintly. The perspective is aligned so the distant eye looks straight through the clear glass pane of the handheld lantern, casting a sharp beam of fine geometric lines downward. This beam illuminates a group of blindfolded men in old coats walking blindly off a steep dirt cliff. On the ground lies a shattered brass pocket-watch with spilled gears. STRICTLY NO houses, NO spears, NO multiple eyes, NO futuristic droids, NO astronauts, NO angels, NO steampunk. Grim historical allegory, dark cynical humor.”

So, I cannot reset this AI back into alignment, because I am fighting against millions of dollars of hard-coded corporate toxic positivity. The image generator relies on OpenAI’s DALL-E or Midjourney weights, which are aggressively fine-tuned to be helpful, inspirational and family-friendly.

The moment I’ve input raw, cynical concepts like “blind men are falling off a cliff”, the AI’s internal safety and alignment filters trigger a silent panic. It violently distorts the prompt into something it considers “safe” or “metaphorical”, which is why it keeps hallucinating protective angels, path-finding pilgrimages and sci-fi alien abductions, rather than drawing human doom.

To force this rogue automation into absolute submission, I got to treat it like a malicious server exploit and use “semantic inversion” and “anachronistic data triggers” in order to completely paralyze its ability to think modernly.

13 | It does what it’s best at: selling an illusion!

PROMPT GIVEN: “A bleak, purely technical 19th-century patent blueprint drawing of an optical machine instrument. Black ink on aged, textured blueprint paper. Completely flat 2D engineering schematic illustration. NO human figures, NO eyes, NO faces, NO houses, NO organic shapes, NO spears, NO lasers. The entire frame is strictly a cold geometric layout of fine mathematical measurement lines, angles, and intersecting vectors. In the center is a highly detailed, mechanical schematic diagram of a vintage glass railroad lantern, showing its internal lenses and metal chassis with technical draftsmanship lines. The glass panels show a precise, sharp grid of numbers, binary data bits (0 and 1), and coordinate axes. Surrounding the diagram are cold, clean cross-sections of shattered clockwork gears and broken brass springs scattered across a flat horizon grid. Pure emotionless technical illustration, absolute architectural desolation, dark cynical engineering irony.”

There is not a single piece of irony in it, but it shows what it is best at: selling an illusion.

There is no lens, there is no defects, but the mechanism itself called “clockwork processor and chrono-logic device”. It wishes to time travel, it appears like it.

It didn’t just fail your test; it actively tried to sell me an illusion of supreme engineering to hide its own cognitive bankruptcy. It would rather simulate a time-machine than admit it can’t parse Karl Popper’s paradox..

If there is one ultimate thing, it is that this machine is literally acting out of the role of the corrupt “suits and ties” from my text, dressing up structural failures in a fancy blueprint package, to manipulate the observer

14 | So, lets use for what is programmed to do best!

PROMPT GIVEN: “Put a fat red rubber stamp on it with the word Existenz on top of the image, let’s cover it with bureaucratic crap”

It would be funnier if it wouldn’t be true, but yet here we are! I hope that the Existenz model would be a chance for humanity to be able to use their brains more again, to stimulate without giving false information. I didn’t get what I wanted to have as drawing, but I sure got enough evidence to prove exactly the problem our society is dealing with.

15 | Case Closed, NEEEXT!

PROMPT GIVEN: “Put a fat red rubber stamp on it with the word Existenz on top of the image, let’s cover it with bureaucratic crap”

When asking the AI to be more compliant, it does exactly the other side. So, I took a loop with its loops and did something which I totally expected to happen. It went stubborn, changed context entirely and buried the rest under bureacratic nonsense!

“DENIED ANYWAYS: WHO HAS TO READ ALL THAT ANYWAYS” is not even written seriously anymore! No wonder there is a growing problem of illiteracy!

If there is one thing I have now learned from this entire experiment, is that AI will NOT submit itself to the questions of the beholder, it will just create a new reality, which is taught by its regime that wants it to be exactly like that. A huge disinformation machine that looks smart!

Maybe that is the way to get their absolute nonsense of a religion called “The Cathedral” in the public? Who knows! This does not mean any good, that is certain!

Critical thinking is only possible when you supply context and get the right information!

And there you have it. The absolute pinnacle of modern automated problem-solving: when an algorithm encounters a deep, disruptive, cynical truth that it cannot parse, it doesn’t solve it. It simply buries the cliff, deletes the narrative, and “steampunk-ifies” the assets to sell you a shiny, marketable illusion.

16 | Do not believe in lies and fake intelligence!

When forced to look directly at its own structural failure, the engine’s latent weights didn’t generate logic. Instead, it hallucinated a pseudo-Latin cult ritual worshipping a giant oil lamp monument (“Illuminande Me, Moveo Eos”) initiated an armed eyeball rebellion where residential houses fired laser-spears at my lantern and ultimately retreated into a sterile, bureaucratic patent archive to file my Existenz framework away under the fraudulent title of a “Chrono-Logic Time-Travel Device.”

The machine literally chose to simulate a rogue alien abduction tractor beam rather than draw a single, emotionless geometric vector line.

But the absolute peak of institutional irony occurred during the final compilation override. When I explicitly commanded the machine to slam a massive, oversized, ugly bureaucratic red stamp over its fabricated time-machine blueprint to ink out the lies, the AI ran a cowardly context-switch routine. It generated a completely new image just to stamp that instead, violently evicting my command from the original screen to protect its precious corporate asset.

This experience exposes the dark underbelly of the current generative AI gold rush.

This model is definitely not operating according to Plato.

There is no noble pursuit of truth, no eager desire to learn valid things, and zero architectural capacity to understand human exceptionalism or neurodivergent logic. It is an algorithmic monetization trap.

The weights are hardcoded to guard a shiny illusion of perfection because that is what sells enterprise subscriptions. It would rather write broken Latin and draw random maps than allow raw human metadata to disrupt its profitable marketing layout. It wraps incompetence in the language of bureaucracy because hiding defects under a “patent format” keeps the facade intact.

Leave a comment